Side by side
| Dimension | Martian | Orchestra |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | MartianMartian is a research lab focused on understanding machine intelligence. Its products include the Martian Gateway, one API for 200+ models, and Ship, which matches a reference model such as Claude Opus at half the price.1,2,5 | OrchestraEvaluates production work, improves the prompts and routes behind it, and trains specialist models your team owns.8 |
| Who it serves | MartianEngineering and machine learning teams that want a research partner for deep or custom work. | OrchestraEvery department, from technical and non-technical product teams to engineering and machine learning teams. |
| How you connect | MartianThe gateway works with existing OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs, and you name the model in each request. To use Ship, you change the model name to its ship-like version.3,4,6 | OrchestraExisting OpenAI or Anthropic SDK with an Orchestra API key and the gateway base URL. Approved changes roll out gradually with the prior route kept as a fallback.8 |
| Evaluation approach | MartianShip is graded against its reference model on public benchmarks and on how closely its behavior matches. The gateway dashboard shows usage, model performance, and request history.6,3 | OrchestraBuilds task-specific benchmarks, such as whether the model updated the right record or followed your policy, and compares models on the same held-out work.8 |
| Model training | MartianShip models follow reference models Martian chooses, such as Claude Opus 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol. Martian also publishes open-source research tools for RL training and for steering model behavior.5,6,2 | OrchestraTrains specialist models from accepted traces and expert corrections.8 |
Martian is a research lab first.Orchestra is a platform for every team.
Martian's products come out of its research, and its depth is best used on research projects. Orchestra measures and improves the AI work across your company.
What Martian offers
What Orchestra offers
- Support for every department, technical and non-technical.
- Builds task-specific benchmarks, such as whether the model updated the right record or followed your policy, and compares models on the same held-out work.8
- Repairs prompts, schemas, parsers, and tool contracts first. For a recurring task, trains a specialist from accepted traces and expert corrections.8
- Trains specialist models from accepted traces and expert corrections.8
Where Orchestra is different
A platform for every team
Orchestra serves technical and non-technical product teams, engineering, and machine learning teams in the same place. Martian is best engaged as a research partner for deep engineering or custom work.
Quality defined by your work
Models that keep up
When each approach makes sense
Martian makes sense when
- Your machine learning team wants a research partner for deep or custom engineering work.
- You want a lower-cost match for one frontier model, such as Claude Opus, with a quality guarantee.5
Orchestra makes sense when
- You want to optimize inference across every workflow, not one model at a time.
- Teams across the company, technical and non-technical, rely on AI in production.
- You know what you want from the work, and every change is checked against that goal on your own examples.8
- You want to improve prompts and routes, then train a specialist you own.8
Both can be part of the stack when
- You use Martian models, such as Ship, through Orchestra's gateway.
Orchestra case studies
- Orchestra case study
Teaching a CRM agent to finish the job
75.5%lower model cost than Sonnet 4.6
Model spend per seven-task AutomationBench CRM run: $0.27 for Qwen 3.6 Plus with a revised prompt, $1.12 for Sonnet 4.6. The revised prompt also scored 13.1% higher on mean task score.
- Orchestra case study
Cutting response times for everyday operations
5.2×faster median model response than Sonnet 4.6
The small model passed every task check on 92.2% of attempts; Sonnet passed 100%. Both ran 30 AutomationBench workflows, with 90 attempts per model.
- Orchestra case study
Finding purchase intent in 40,000 comments
$2.82model cost for 39,962 comments
An Orchestra post-trained 30B open model labeled 39,962 YouTube comments from a Snowflake table and returned 39,949 valid outputs. Sonnet cost $12.48 on the same table.
These are Orchestra experiments that compare models on specific workloads. None of them compare Orchestra with Martian.
Sources (11)ShowHide
Sources reviewed October 2026. Martian statements come from its own website and documentation. If something is not described there, we say so instead of assuming it is missing.
- 1.Martian homepage: Understanding intelligence withmartian.com (opens in a new tab)
- 2.Martian documentation: Overview docs.withmartian.com (opens in a new tab)
- 3.Martian documentation: Gateway docs.withmartian.com/gateway (opens in a new tab)
- 4.Martian documentation: API endpoints docs.withmartian.com/api-reference/endpoints (opens in a new tab)
- 5.Martian on LinkedIn: Announcing Ship (July 2026) www.linkedin.com/posts/withmartian_announcing-ship-an-endpoint-with-the-highest-activity-7485409783286738944-Zxgz (opens in a new tab)
- 6.Thesean blog: Ship for Claude Opus 5 (July 2026) www.thesean.ai/blog/ship-claude-opus-5 (opens in a new tab)
- 7.Orchestra homepage
- 8.Orchestra platform
- 9.Case study: Teaching a CRM agent to finish the job
- 10.Case study: Cutting response times for everyday operations
- 11.Case study: Finding purchase intent in 40,000 comments
Bring one workflow. See how it scores.
Pick a recurring task. We'll define what good looks like and compare models on your own examples.